Skip to main content

Table 3 Analysis of proximal femur anatomic values in respect to stem anteversion: Stem anteversion relationship was statistically significant in respect to all proximal femur anteversion parameters. In the logistic regression no parameter was significantly associated with stem positioning within the 10°–20° of anteversion target (OR Odds Ratio)

From: Stem anteversion is not affected by proximal femur geometry in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty

 

Relationship of proximal femur anteversion with stem version

Probability of stem version 10°20°

 

Mean (°)

SD

Min; Max

Linear Correlation

Linear Regression

Logistic regression

σ

P

β

R2

P

OR

P

FNV

6.6

8.8

−28; 25

0.39

< 0.001

0.21

15.6%

< 0.001

0.99

0.63

F-PCA

11.2

8.6

−13; 32

0.37

< 0.001

0.20

14.0%

< 0.001

1.02

0.47

F-ACA

6.4

8.8

−26; 26

0.56

< 0.001

0.30

31.8%

< 0.001

0.96

0.16

F-MAA

8.7

7.9

−11; 28

0.52

< 0.001

0.31

27.1%

< 0.001

0.99

0.70

E-PCA

20.7

8.4

4; 45

0.35

< 0.001

0.19

12.0%

< 0.001

1.00

0.92

E-ACA

3.7

9.4

−26; 35

0.52

< 0.001

0.26

26.9%

< 0.001

0.97

0.24

E-MAA

12.1

7.7

−7.5; 40

0.51

< 0.001

0.31

25.8%

< 0.001

0.98

0.47

D-PCA

27.6

8.5

9; 52

0.35

< 0.001

0.19

12.5%

< 0.001

0.99

0.71

D-ACA

3.4

8.9

−24; 34

0.46

< 0.001

0.24

20.8%

< 0.001

0.98

0.44

D-MAA

15.5

7.9

−5; 40

0.44

< 0.001

0.26

19.7%

< 0.001

0.98

0.54