Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinical outcomes in modified kinematically-aligned and guided-motion bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasties

From: Comparison of short-term clinical results between modified kinematically-aligned and guided motion bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty

 

KA

BCS

P-Value

Hedges’g (95%CI)

Range of motion

 Extension, °

−2.0 ± 3.4

−2.3 ± 3.5

N.S

0.09 (−0.36 to 0.54)

 Flexion, °

123.5 ± 11.7

125.3 ± 11.9

N.S

−0.15 (−0.6 to 0.30)

2011 Knee Society Score

 Objective knee indicators (100)

94.3 ± 5.2

90.1 ± 9.6

0.0157

0.55 (0.10 to 1.01)

 Patient satisfaction (40)

28.4 ± 6.0

23.9 ± 7.1

0.0039

0.68 (0.23 to 1.15)

 Patient expectations (15)

11.4 ± 2.7

10.2 ± 3.0

N.S

0.41 (−0.03 to 0.87)

 Functional activities (100)

74.6 ± 14.3

62.8 ± 16.6

0.0013

0.76 (0.30 to 1.23)

  1. The data are given as mean ± standard deviation
  2. KA Kinematically-aligned, BCS Bicruciate stabilized