Skip to main content

Table 5 Correlation between the rotational mismatch and the 2011 Knee Society Score in modified kinematically-aligned and guided-motion bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasties

From: Comparison of short-term clinical results between modified kinematically-aligned and guided motion bicruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty

 

KA

BCS

R

95%CI

P-value

R

95%CI

P-value

Objective knee indicators (100)

−0.056

−0.354, 0.252

N.S

−0.411

−0.655, −0.09

0.0141

Patient satisfaction (40)

−0.19

−0.467, 0.12

N.S

−0.354

−0.614, −0.023

0.0372

Patient expectations (15)

−0.053

−0.351, 0.255

N.S

−0.138

−0.45, 0.205

N.S

Functional activities (100)

−0.194

−0.47, 0.117

N.S

−0.387

−0.638, −0.062

0.0217

  1. The data are given as mean ± standard deviation
  2. CI Confidence interval, KA Kinematically-aligned, BCS Bi-cruciate stabilized