Skip to main content

TableĀ 2 Differences between the groups’ mean and the distribution characteristics of parameters

From: Is conventional magnetic resonance imaging superior to radiography in the functional integrity evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament in patients with knee osteoarthritis?

Parametersa

ACLD group

ACLI group

P-value

HKA (°)

167.4 ± 5.0

170.6 ± 3.7

< 0.001

MPTA (°)

84.0 ± 3.6

85.5 ± 2.4

< 0.001

LDFA (°)

89.2 ± 2.8

89.0 ± 2.2

0.538

PTSPM (°)

7.4 ± 3.7

5.7 ± 7.1

0.079

PTSAA (°)

9.9 ± 3.7

8.3 ± 6.6

0.056

JLCAAPS (°)

7.1 ± 2.7

5.6 ± 2.4

< 0.001

JLCAAP (°)

4.3 ± 2.3

3.5 ± 1.8

0.004

JLCAVS (°)

1.1 ± 3.0

0.9 ± 2.2

0.605

STFS (mm)

0.2 ± 3.0

-1.0 ± 2.6

0.003

CTFSAPS (mm)

8.5 ± 3.0

7.5 ± 2.1

0.001

CTFSAP (mm)

7.3 ± 2.5

6.5 ± 2.0

0.004

CTFSVS (mm)

7.2 ± 3.0

6.6 ± 2.2

0.063

MWPPT%XR (%)

65.6 ± 4.4

59.6 ± 4.9

< 0.001

MWPPT%MRI (%)

81.7 ± 9.9

68.4 ± 8.4

< 0.001

MRI grades of ACL (grade 3–4 / grade 1–2)

60/2

55/189

< 0.001

  1. aAll the diagnostic parameters were presented as mean ± SD except for the MRI grades of ACL