Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview of revision cases and primary indications for revision

From: Is there an increased revision rate due to early tibial component loosening with a modern total knee arthroplasty design? A retrospective analysis from a large volume arthroplasty centre

 

Total No. Revisions

No. Revisions per 1000 Implant years

All Cemented

Attune

All Other Cemented

PFC

Other Cemented

Attune Standard

Attune S + 

All Cemented

Attune

All Other

PFC

Other Cemented

Attune Standard

Attune S + 

Total No. Revisions

308

38

270

133

137

34

4

3.58

2.98

3.68

3.15

4.40

3.05

2.50

Pain

26

0

26

20

6

0

0

0.30

0.00

0.35

0.47

0.19

0.00

0.00

Infection

77

6

71

36

35

5

1

0.89

0.47

0.97

0.85

1.12

0.45

0.63

Aseptic Loosening (All)

88

9

79

22

57

8

1

1.02

0.71

1.08

0.52

1.83

0.72

0.63

Loosening Tibia

65

7

58

13

45

6

1

0.75

0.55

0.79

0.31

1.44

0.54

0.63

Loosening Femur

45

6

39

6

33

5

1

0.52

0.47

0.53

0.14

1.06

0.45

0.63

Loosening Patella

13

2

11

6

5

5

1

0.15

0.16

0.15

0.14

0.16

0.45

0.63

Dislocation/Subluxation

2

0

2

1

1

0

0

0.02

0.00

0.03

0.02

0.03

0.00

0.00

Periprosthetic Fracture

10

2

8

6

2

2

0

0.12

0.16

0.11

0.14

0.06

0.18

0.00

Implant Wear/Fracture

5

0

5

2

3

0

0

0.06

0.00

0.07

0.05

0.10

0.00

0.00

Instability

36

3

33

17

16

2

1

0.42

0.24

0.45

0.40

0.51

0.18

0.63

Malalignment

9

1

8

6

2

1

0

0.10

0.08

0.11

0.14

0.06

0.09

0.00

Stiffness

18

5

13

5

8

5

0

0.21

0.39

0.18

0.12

0.26

0.45

0.00

Progressive OA

22

10

12

8

4

10

0

0.26

0.79

0.16

0.19

0.13

0.90

0.00

Other

15

2

13

10

3

1

1

0.17

0.16

0.18

0.24

0.10

0.09

0.63