Skip to main content

Table 3 The effects of variables upon survival given as proportional hazards calculated using cox regression analysis

From: Is there an increased revision rate due to early tibial component loosening with a modern total knee arthroplasty design? A retrospective analysis from a large volume arthroplasty centre

 

All Cause Revision

Revision for Loosening Any Component

Revision for Loosening Tibial Component

HR

P-value

HR

P-value

HR

P-value

Age

  < 65

1

-

1

-

1

-

 65–74

0.6

 < 0.001

0.5

0.01

0.5

0.005

  ≥ 75

0.4

 < 0.001

0.2

 < 0.001

0.2

 < 0.001

Gender

 Female

1

-

1

-

1

-

 Male

1.2

ns

1.3

ns

0.9

ns

Indication

 OA

1

-

1

-

1

-

 Inflammatory Arthropathy

0.9

ns

1.10

ns

7.00 × 10–1

ns

 AVN

1.7

ns

4.80 × 10–7

ns

3.50 × 10–7

ns

 Trauma

3.6

ns

5.1

ns

7.4

ns

 Prev Infection

7.60 × 10–7

ns

8.70 × 10–7

ns

7.70 × 10–7

ns

 Other

7.50 × 10–7

ns

4.90 × 10–7

ns

3.80 × 10–7

ns

ASA

 I

1

-

1

-

1

-

 II

0.7

ns

0.6

0.03

0.6

ns

 II

0.9

ns

0.5

0.04

0.4

0.05

 IV

0.7

ns

3.20 × 10–7

ns

2.40 × 10–7

ns

 V

1.02 × 10–6

ns

1.50 × 10–6

ns

1.20 × 10–6

ns

Meniscal Constraint

 Unconstrained Mobile

1

-

1

-

1

-

 Unconstrained Fixed

1.8

0.04

0.6

ns

0.4

ns

 PS mobile

1.8

ns

0.6

ns

0.4

ns

 PS Fixed

0.8

ns

0.07

0.02

0.16

0.04

  1. HR Hazard Ratio, ns not significant