Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the final analysis

From: What is the clinical utility of acoustic and vibrational analyses in uncemented total hip arthroplasty?

Authors (Year)

Study Design

Sample size

Dataset

Sex (% M)

Age

BMI

Implant type

Surgical Approach

Equipment Utilized

Sensor Location

Sampling Frequency

Sampling Depth

Goossens et al. (2020)

Retrospective Cohort

26

Single institution

n/a

20–82 (range)

n/a

Profemur Gladiator

n/a

Microphone: Type 378B02, Software: Simcenter Testlab

n/a

40.96 kHz

n/a

Zhuang et al. (2022) [1, 18]

Retrospective Cohort

55

Single institution

17

66.8 ± 9.8

24.2 ± 3.5

Accolade II

direct anterior

Meter: LA-7500

Software: Oscope v2.1

1 m above ground; 2 m away from surgical table

64 kHz

16 bit

Morohashi et al. (2017) [3]

Prospective Cohort

71

Single institution

16%

65.8 (range 41–86)

24.3 (range 17.7–38.2)

Accolade TMZF

direct lateral: 59 anterolateral:7

Meter: LA-4440 software: LabChart

n/a

40 kHz

n/a

Homma et al. (2022) [7]

Observational

29

Single institution

21%

48–89 (range)

n/a

Accolade II; Taperloc Complete Microplasty; Full-hydroxyapatite porous triple tapered stem

direct anterior

Meter: LA-7500

Software: Oscope v2.1

1 m above ground; 2 m away from surgical table

64 kHz

16 bit

Pastrav et al. (2009) [19]

Observational

83

Single institution

n/a

n/a

n/a

Advanced Custom-Made Implants

n/a

Meter: Pimento vibration analyzer Software: Pimento 5.2

n/a

n/a

n/a

Sakai et al. (2022) [15]

Observational

12

Single institution

33%

70.1

n/a

n/a

n/a

Directional microphone

on the right and left sides of the upper- and lower-limbs of the patient 2 m from the surgical field on each side

44.1 kHz

16 bit

Zhuang et al. (2022) [1, 18]

Retrospective Cohort

49

Single institution

16%

65.7 ± 11.3

24.0 ± 3.69

Taperloc Microplasty; Accolade II

direct anterior

Meter: LA-7500 Software: Oscope v2.1

1 m above ground; 2 m away from surgical table

64 kHz

16 bit

Sakai et al. (2021) [16]

Retrospective Cohort

11

Single institution

36%

71.6 (range 54–81)

n/a

Acetabular cup G7

n/a

Microphone: Mic Fp-5500

n/a

44.1 kHz

16 bit

Homma et al. (2022) [7]

Observational

62

Single institution

17%

66.3 ± 9.6

Height:156.4 ± 7.4 Weight: 58.1 ± 11.1

Accolade II

direct anterior

Meter: LA-7500

Software: Oscope v2.1

1 m above ground; 2 m away from surgical table

64 kHz

16 bit

Homma et al. (2023) [2, 20]

Observational

51

Single institution

19%

68 ± 13

23.19 ± 3.39

Accolade II

direct anterior

Meter: LA-7500

Software: Oscope, v2.1

1 m above ground; 2 m away from surgical table

64 kHz

16 bit

Mulier et al. (2008) [4]

Observational

30

Single institution

40%

53.9 ± 7.6

n/a

Intraoperatively custom made

prosthesis stem; Hydroxyapatite coated Pinnacle cup

n/a

Meter: Pimento vibration analyzer software: Pimento 5.2

FRF measured directly on the prosthesis neck

n/a

n/a

McConnell et al. (2018) [17]

Observational

101

Single institution

35%

69.9 ± 12.3

29 (range 26–32)

Corail femoral stem

posterior

Microphone: Auna MRS-01

Software: Amadeus Pro v2.2.2

At the outer edge of the laminar flow

canopy

44.1 kHz

32 bit

  1. BMI Body mass index, Hz Hertz