Table 4 Studies that evaluated sBCA vs TKA
Author | Year | Type | Group 1, (n) | Group 2, (n) | Follow-up | Outcome | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Garner AJ [60] | 2023 | Retrospective cohort | partial to combined partial knee arthroplasty, (23) | rTKA,(23) | 17Â months | Functional assessment | Nearer- natural gait and improved satisfaction |
Haffar A [62] | 2022 | Retrospective cohort | sBiKA, (27) | rTKA, (30) | 7.4Â years for sBiKA; 9.7Â years for rTKA | Functional assessment, operative times, length of stay, complication rates, and the need for reoperations | Equivalent survivorship, greater improvement in function, and cost-effective |
Pritchett JW [61] | 2022 | Retrospective cohort | UKA-BCA, (73) | rTKA, (75) | 15Â years for UKA-BCA; 13Â years for UKA-TKA | Functional assessment, and patient satisfaction | Successful treatment for disease progression following UKA |